Antitrust Process Leveraged to Prevent Foreign Ownership of Steel Companies
When the world’s largest steel company Arcelor Mittal acquired a 28% stake in steel company China Oriental Group in November 2007, it made no secret of its desire to gain control of China Oriental and aggressively expand into the Chinese market. That dream, however, became short-lived. On May 13, 2008, Arcelor dropped its takeover bid of China Oriental after the deal failed to clear the Chinese anti-monopoly authority in the required six months.
Yet anti-trust concerns could not have been significant. After all, the output of China Oriental is only a tenth of that of newly-created Chinese leader Hebei Steel. The real reason for the deal’s failure, then, must be the prohibition of foreign control of steel enterprises in China. The anti-trust process, however, was conveniently leveraged to achieve the ultimate goal of preventing foreign control.
In communicating with us through this blog, you should not provide any confidential information to us concerning any potential or actual legal matter you may have. Before providing any such information to us, you must obtain approval to do so from one of our lawyers.
By choosing to communicate with us without such prior approval, you understand and agree that Sheppard Mullin will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.